(123)456 7890 [email protected]

Thesis statement for argument against death penalty

The death penalty, or capital punishment, refers to punishment by death imparted to a person by a state or a legal framework.

Because of the nature of the punishment, the death penalty raises a plethora of human-rights issues, which, consequently, has led to its abolishment in a majority of countries across the globe.

However, despite the controversies surrounding it, it is still practiced in one form or another in about 58 countries. The death penalty has been a staple form of punishment throughout human history and across societies, largely reserved for perpetrators of especially heinous crimes the qualitative judgment of which varies from society to society. These crimes may be perpetrated against individuals such as murder, rape, adultery, etc.

Historical records indicate that the death penalty has been practiced in human societies stretching back to the earliest periods of recorded history as a punitive form of justice. The crimes that may be punished with the death penalty vary from society to society, in the past, as in the present.

The methods for carrying out the execution or death penalty have varied throughout history as well. Methods for carrying out capital punishment have ranged from boiling to death, flaying, disembowelment, impalement, stoning, shooting with a gun, dismemberment, etc.

In recent history, methods for capital punishment have moved progressively towards the more human, particularly in the first world. In the few first world societies that still practice the death penalty, death by lethal injection is the execution method of choice, selected because of its quick, efficient, and pain-free nature. The death penalty has been, for obvious reasons, a massive source of controversy in most countries across the world in the past few decades.

Besides issues of human rights, questions of the ethical and even legal right of the state to impart punishment by death have been raised vociferously by advocates of the abolishment of the death penalty. Presently, the death penalty has been scrapped completely by 97 countries, while the 58 countries that actively practice it face overwhelming global pressure to abolish this punishment completely.

Thesis statements on the death penalty

With a progressive move towards more humane methods of punishment, it is only a matter of time before the death penalty is struck off completely from all law books. Death Penalty Thesis Statement Examples:. The philosophical and ethical basis for the death penalty, thus, is fundamentally shaky. The death penalty, consequently, must be abolished.

Crimes are situational, impulsive, extreme acts and not so much personal acts committed with permanent destructive instinct: retribution and not extinction should be preferred. Why capital punishment when life imprisonment can also cause pain and yet leave scope for reform and retribution. Filed under Thesis Statement Examples. Thesis Statement. Skip to content.There are no other violations that could be greater than taking another human being life.

The Death Penalty could be view as view an evil concept when an individual is put to death because their acts have caused afflictions to a community, therefore, killing the offender to prevent a repeating the same behavior brought distress and harm accuser's' family.

Therefore, the death penalty is not a consideration that. Introduction A. Startling Statement B. Some information and recent data with regards to the implementation of death penalty globally will be briefly discussed. Thesis Statement II. Body A. Counterarguments 1. The death penalty deters individuals from committing crimes; therefore, the crime rates decrease. Thesis Statement: Has been ongoing throughout the world as being both unconstitutional and inhumane or a just punishment for those who offend certain laws, eye for an eye.

Capital Punishment should be legalized because it is ethical, safety for the public and to lower the cost of prisons. Capital punishment is appropriate because it provides a strong durance against future crime, it protects the rights of victims, and because everyone benefits from it. Background: History. There have been some highly publicized trails that have brought Capital punishment out of the shadows and into the spot light, most notably were the Nuremberg. While some people may agree with the death penalty, others may not.

Some people feel that locking a criminal in prison for their life will keep the world safe, while other, believe that giving them the death penalty will deter other people from committing the crime. Relevance link: While studies show that states without the death penalty have a lower crime rate, no one can be certain that it does. Thesis: No civilized country should have the power to kill their own citizens.

thesis statement for argument against death penalty

The death penalty violates religious views, it is not a deterrent for other crimes, and it is more costly than profitable. The Attention Step Attention: Did you know that since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States ininnocent men and women have been released from death row. Every human has a right to life 2.Thesis for being against the death penalty If the U.

Human rights activists, leading antagonists, are occasionally on the streets to ….

The death penalty has been a tool that has been used for thesis for being against the death penalty centuries to punish those that commit heinous crimes.

Violates Bill of Rights 3. It lacks the deterrent effect to which its advocates commonly refer. Capital punishment is the best way to prevent some criminals from carrying out their gruesome acts. Because of the nature of the punishment, the death penalty raises a plethora of human-rights issues, which, consequently, has led to its abolishment in a ….

Search for: Home. Studies show that the mentally ill, people thesis for being against the death penalty of color, and the poor make up the majority of death row inmates. Order now.

In addition, many studies seem to disprove the theory that the death penalty is a good deterrence against violent crimes and murders.

For example, your thesis thesis for being against the death penalty could be: The United States should abolish the death penalty because the system of implementation has serious flaws. The death penalty is totalitarian. The opponents of the death penalty argue that it causes incredible suffering and pain for the sentenced and brutalizes society as a whole where it operates.

When researching a topic for an argumentative essay, accuracy is important, which means the quality of your sources is important. Research paper on merchant of thesis for being against the death penalty venice. Thus arises one of …. Debunk both arguments II. Research paper on merchant of venice.

Introduction 1. There are other ways of preventing the culprit from harming others. The Death Penalty: Con. Here are 10 reasons why, any one of which could be enough.While the death penalty has no history because it was born with humanity, the doctrine distinguishes two major phases in the history of capital punishment that separates the eighteenth century. Thus, prior to this, the death penalty was applied to a large number of crimes and its various forms of execution were characterized not only by killing, but by doing so producing the greatest torments and suffering to the victim.

From the illustration to the present, both a noticeable decrease in executions and a decrease in the catalog of crimes punishing the death penalty, which generally reduces, in the countries that recognize it, to the qualified homicides, child rapes or illicit drug trafficking.

Contemporary states have gone from an inordinate extension of the death penalty to an exceptional, scarce and infrequent application of the death penalty. In this new configuration the democratic principles of humanity, equality, fraternity and the monitoring of Human Rights in contemporary society have influenced. Nowadays, the legal treatment of the death penalty varies between an extreme abolitionism, for which the death penalty is not applied to any crime Germany, Austria, Denmark, France, Norway, the Netherlands, Portugal, Uruguay and Venezuelaand a moderate conservatism, which is characterized by restricting its application, to a certain number of crimes Saudi Arabia, China, USA, Iran, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Perupassing, previously, by an exceptional conservatism, reserved for crimes derived from an emergency situation, as is the case of foreign war Spain, Italy, Peru in the period between and The arguments that are used in favor of the death penalty try to demonstrate appealing to rational or emotional criteria, the coexistence of its establishment or conservation in a certain legal system:.

In line with thesis statement about death penalty, it is pointed out that the death penalty has been practiced by all peoples and at all times and still survives today in some fully developed nations like the USA.

Its eradication of the punitive catalog would not make sense because humanity throughout its history has shown itself favorable to its application. It is also pointed out that the restriction of capital punishment does not necessarily imply its disappearance. Faced with the commission of crimes and serious crimes, the immediate, indifferent and prompt application of capital punishment thesis is postulated with the aim of restoring the normative trust of society in legal norms and law. By executing the culprit, society recovers from the commotion produced by the perpetration of the crimes and potential criminals are intimidated and persuaded about the consequences that their criminal act can bring.

The severity of the sanction has a double effect; On the one hand, it allows society to rekindle its confidence in the norms and renew your faith in the law, and on the other hand help to instill fear to all who intend to commit criminal offenses.

Thomas Aquinas already pointed out that in the same way that the surgeon must amputate the arm to prevent the infection from spreading to the rest of the body; thus, the delinquent must also be eliminated to avoid contaminating society. According to criterion of thesis statement on death penalty, capital punishment favors the offender, the treasury and society.

The supposed utility to the treasury is manifested in the high cost that represents the maintenance of the wrongdoer that is opposed to the lowest sum of the cost of execution. The social benefit would be achieved, in relation to preventive criteria, when society escapes the dangerous presence of the criminal, counteracts the inclination to crime.

Deputies from two political parties have proposed a bill so that the death penalty, already contemplated in the Criminal Code of our country, can be imposed on kidnappers, murderers, parricides, sexual violators and perpetrators of enforced disappearance.

Allow me to expose, on the death penalty, some theses. The majority of Guatemalan citizens approve imposing the death penalty, in line with capital punishment thesis statement, on those who commit very serious crimes, such as murder. However, invoking that majority is not precisely the best argument to impose the death penalty.Capital punishment has long engendered considerable debate about both its morality and its effect on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment fall under three general headings: moralutilitarian, and practical.

Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murderbecause they have taken the life of another, have forfeited their own right to life. By contrast, opponents of capital punishment, following the writings of Cesare Beccaria in particular On Crimes and Punishments []argue that, by legitimizing the very behaviour that the law seeks to repress—killing—capital punishment is counterproductive in the moral message it conveys.

Moreover, they urge, when it is used for lesser crimes, capital punishment is immoral because it is wholly disproportionate to the harm done. Although death was prescribed for crimes in many sacred religious documents and historically was practiced widely with the support of religious hierarchiestoday there is no agreement among religious faiths, or among denominations or sects within them, on the morality of capital punishment.

Beginning in the last half of the 20th century, increasing numbers of religious leaders—particularly within Judaism and Roman Catholicism—campaigned against it. Supporters of capital punishment also claim that it has a uniquely potent deterrent effect on potentially violent offenders for whom the threat of imprisonment is not a sufficient restraint.

Speed Thesis: Can You Write a Thesis Statement in 40 seconds?

Opponents, however, point to research that generally has demonstrated that the death penalty is not a more effective deterrent than the alternative sanction of life or long-term imprisonment. There also are disputes about whether capital punishment can be administered in a manner consistent with justice.

thesis statement for argument against death penalty

Those who support capital punishment believe that it is possible to fashion laws and procedures that ensure that only those who are really deserving of death are executed. By contrast, opponents maintain that the historical application of capital punishment shows that any attempt to single out certain kinds of crime as deserving of death will inevitably be arbitrary and discriminatory.

They also point to other factors that they think preclude the possibility that capital punishment can be fairly applied, arguing that the poor and ethnic and religious minorities often do not have access to good legal assistance, that racial prejudice motivates predominantly white juries in capital cases to convict black and other nonwhite defendants in disproportionate numbers, and that, because errors are inevitable even in a well-run criminal justice system, some people will be executed for crimes they did not commit.

Death Penalty Thesis Statement

Finally, they argue that, because the appeals process for death sentences is protracted, those condemned to death are often cruelly forced to endure long periods of uncertainty about their fate. Under the influence of the European Enlightenmentin the latter part of the 18th century there began a movement to limit the scope of capital punishment. Until that time a very wide range of offenses, including even common theft, were punishable by death—though the punishment was not always enforced, in part because juries tended to acquit defendants against the evidence in minor cases.

In the U. In Venezuela became the first country to abolish capital punishment for all crimes, including serious offenses against the state e. San Marino was the first European country to abolish the death penalty, doing so in ; by the early 20th century several other countries, including the Netherlands, NorwaySwedenDenmarkand Italyhad followed suit though it was reintroduced in Italy under the fascist regime of Benito Mussolini.

By the mids some 25 countries had abolished the death penalty for murder, though only about half of them also had abolished it for offenses against the state or the military code.

For example, Britain abolished capital punishment for murder inbut treason, piracy, and military crimes remained capital offenses until During the last third of the 20th century, the number of abolitionist countries increased more than threefold. One reason for the significant increase in the number of abolitionist states was that the abolition movement was successful in making capital punishment an international human rights issue, whereas formerly it had been regarded as solely an internal matter for the countries concerned.

This resolution was reaffirmed by the General Assembly in Optional protocols to the European Convention on Human Rights and to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights have been established, under which countries party to the convention and the covenant undertake not to carry out executions.

The Council of Europe and the EU established as a condition of membership in their organizations the requirement that prospective member countries suspend executions and commit themselves to abolition. This decision had a remarkable impact on the countries of central and eastern Europe, prompting several of them—e. In the s many African countries—including Angola, Djibouti, Mozambique, and Namibia—abolished capital punishment, though most African countries retained it.

Capital punishment Article Media Additional Info. Article Contents. Load Previous Page. Arguments for and against capital punishment Capital punishment has long engendered considerable debate about both its morality and its effect on criminal behaviour. Load Next Page.For the worst crimes, life without parole is better, for many reasons. The system can make tragic mistakes.

As of now, wrongly convicted people on death row have been exonerated. Life without parole, on the books in most states, also prevents reoffending. Two big advantages:.

Study after study has found that the death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison. The process is much more complex than for any other kind of criminal case. The largest costs come at the pre-trial and trial stages.

These apply whether or not the defendant is convicted, let alone sentenced to death. The most recent FBI data confirms this.

For people without a conscience, fear of being caught is the best deterrent. The death penalty is no more effective in deterring others than life sentences.

Thesis for being against the death penalty:::Thesis For Being Against The Death Penalty

The death penalty magnifies social and economic inequalities. It isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyers.

It doesn't apply to people with money. Practically everyone sentenced to death had to rely on an overworked public defender. Like no other punishment, it subjects families of murder victims to a process which makes healing even harder. Even families who have supported it in principle have testified to the protracted and unavoidable damage that the death penalty process does to families like theirs and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative.

It comes down to whether we should keep the death penalty for retribution or revenge—the only plausible reasons to support it. I think your strongest reason is that innocent people have been executed. Death is irreversible so finding out someone is innocent after they've executed is terrible. If they are serving a life sentence in prison, then we could put this right by letting them go and maybe compensating them financially for the time they have spent in jail.

You could find some good examples of people executed that have been found innocent on Google and quote them. If you are saying that it doesn't deter the rate of crimes you might need some evidence of that.

I wouldn't use the argument that it's cheaper to the taxpayer because I actually think it costs the government far more to feed and supervise prisoners than it costs to execute them. This is actually an argument FOR the death penalty I think!

To replace this reason you could use the fact that "Do not kill" is one of the Ten Commandments and "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Both these documents are widely respected as being ethical, and the death penalty goes against both. Maybe also quote very rich people who "get away with murder" because they hire "dream team" defense teams Most Americans think O. I'm still not convinced about costs - if, as Susan says: "The largest costs come at the pre-trial and trial stages.

Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment.

You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others.

Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check.Death in itself is powerful enough to send shivers down the spine of every human being. Discussing it in a legalized and state-imposed manner makes it as controversial as it is dreadful. Drafting a thesis statement on the dreaded death penalty lends itself to two hard-line positions where one camp believes it should be abolished, while others want it to remain in force.

thesis statement for argument against death penalty

In our discussion, we are going to take a look at different examples that encompasses the conflicting views surrounding the death penalty. Just remain put to get inspiration from these samples. The theory and practice of the death sentence is an emotive and controversial topic.

When writing a thesis statement and essays on this area, approach it with caution so that you can capture the best arguments from the two opposing sides of the pendulum. Did you like the article?

ThesisPanda Writing Blog. Diabetes Thesis Statement. Thesis statements on success. Calculate your price. Type of paper Essay. Academic level Undergraduate. Deadline 14 days. Want to get more? Enter your e-mail if you want to receive our special offers and professional advice from our writers.

Wait a minute… We have something for you! Get your personal promo code to your e-mail! Terms and conditions Privacy policy.


thoughts on “Thesis statement for argument against death penalty

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *